Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Hart v. 90th Judicial District Court et al
as 1:2015cv00606
Plaintiff:
Wayne Thomas Hart
Defendant:
90th Judicial District Court, James N. Erhart, Larry L. Burgess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hart v. Emmet County 90th District Court et al
as 1:2014cv00924
Plaintiff:
Wayne Thomas Hart
Defendant:
90th Judicial District Court, Richard W. May, James N. Erhart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Hart v. Zimmer Inc et al
as 8:2013cv00391
Defendant:
Does and Zimmer Inc
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hart
Hart v. Old Dominion Freight Line Inc
as 5:2012cv00950
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hart
Defendant:
Old Dominion Freight Line Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HART v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2010cv69368
Plaintiff:
THOMAS HART
Defendant:
BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas Hart v. BNSF Railway Co.
as NE/8:10-CV-00180
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hart
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Co.
hart
as 8:2010cv00180
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Plaintiff:
Thomas hart
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
GIDDENS et al v. A.C. AND S., INC.
as 2:2010cv64321
Plaintiff:
SHIRLEY HART and WILLIAM THOMAS HART
Defendant:
A.C. AND S., INC., A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
UNITED STATES HIGH SPEED RAIL ASSOCIATION, INC. et al v. KUNZ et al
as 1:2009cv02320
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES HIGH SPEED RAIL ASSOCIATION, INC. and GROUP GOETZ ARCHITECTS, P.C.
Defendant:
ANDREW KUNZ, JOSEPH SHELHORSE and THOMAS HART, JR.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504 Copyright Infringement
HART et al v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv66562
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM THOMAS HART and SHIRLEY HART
Defendant:
AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC., AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION, CERTAIN TEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
