Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Emrit, et al. v. Dogg, et al.
as 26-1803
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT, United Emrits of America, SATISH DAT BEAST, Former Client of Larry Birkhead Attorney Nancy Hass of Hallandale Beach, Florida as Family Law Attorney and others
Defendant:
SNOOP DOGG, Marijuana Smoker named Calvin Broadus, STATE OF ARIZONA, The Only State Which Did not Approve of the Holiday for the Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Junior, NBCUNIVERSAL, LLC and others
Beast v. Melber
as 26-496
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT, Former Client of Paul Gardner, Esquire of Gardner Law Group of Baltimore, Maryland as Attorney for Outcast, Mya, Mos Def, Tommy Davidson, and Salahis, SATISH DAT BEAST, Former Client of "Larry Birkhead Attorney" Nancy Hass of Hallandale Beach, Florida as Family Law Attorney and GO GO SATISH, Former Client of Thomas Hart, Esquire of On the Potomac of Washington, DC and Holland & Knight, LLP and Entertainment Attorney for Gloria Estefan and James Todd Smith also Known as LL Cool J
Defendant:
ARI MELBER, of MSNOW (Journalist Who Covers Hip Hop Music), UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP N.V., NBCUNIVERSAL MEDIA, LLC and others
Emrit, et al. v. Dogg, et al.
as 26-884
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT, Former Client of "Larry Birkhead Attorney" Nancy Hass of Hallandale Beach, Florida as Family Law Attorney, United Emrits of America, SATISH DAT BEAST, Former Client of Paul Gardner, Esquire of Gardner Law Group of Baltimore, Maryland as Entertainment Attorney for Outkast, Mya, Mos Def, Tommy Davidson, and Salahis and others
Defendant:
SNOOP DOGG, Marijuana Smoker named Calvin Broadus, SNOOP DOGG, Bowl in Arizona, The Racist STATE OF ARIZONA, The Only State Which Did not Approve of the Holiday for the Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Junior and others
Emrit, et al v. Snoop Doggy Dogg, et al
as 26-1037
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT, Former Client of Paul Gardner, Esquire of Gardner Law Group of Baltimore, Maryland as Entertainment Attorney for Outkast, Mya, Mos Def, Tommy Davidson and Salahis, SATISH DAT BEAST, Former Client of Larry Birkhead Attorney Nancy Hass of Hallandale Beach Florida as Family Law Attorney and GO GO SATISH, Former Client of Thomas Hart, Esquire of On The Potomac of Washington, DC and Holand & Knight, LLP and Entertainment Attorney for Gloria Estefan and James Todd Smith also Known as LL Cool J
Defendant:
SNOOP DOGGY DOGG, Marijuana Smoker named Calvin Broadus, SNOOP DOGGY DOGG BOWL IN ARIZONA, THE RACIST STATE OF ARIZONA, The Only State Which Did not Approve of the Holiday for the Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Junior and others
Pierce v. McCarthy
as 25-938
Plaintiff:
JOHN ANTHONY PIERCE
Defendant:
TIMOTHY MCCARTHY, ANDREW LOWE, Deputy Superintendent Programs, Auburn Correctional Facility, PATRICK KENNEDY, Senior Offender Rehabilitation Counselor, Auburn Correctional Facility and others
Cooper v. Panda Express, Inc. et al
as 3:2025cv00080
Plaintiff:
Erik Cooper
Defendant:
Panda Express, Inc. a California corporation doing business as Panda Express, Joseph Manning, Derek Hanson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
HART et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv17102
Plaintiff:
THOMAS HART and THE ESTATE OF STACY MAY HART
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hart v. Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00138
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hart
Defendant:
Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Hart v. Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc.
as 6:2022cv02068
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hart
Defendant:
Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc. and Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Pierce v. McCarthy et al
as 9:2021cv01301
Plaintiff:
John Anthony Pierce
Defendant:
Timothy McCarthy, James Donahue, Thomas Napoli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
