Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Hoskins v. Lawhead et al
as 1:2018cv07732
Defendant:
Brandon V. Lawhead, Donaldson Lawhead, Tammara Lawhead and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lawrence Hoskins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lawrence v. United States of America
as 1:2018cv00038
Petitioner:
Martin Thomas Lawrence
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Manuel v. Lawrence
as 1:2017cv00769
Plaintiff:
Melinda Manuel
Defendant:
Thomas Lawrence
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wingate v. Thomas Lawrence Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00551
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wingate
Defendant:
Thomas Lawrence Enterprises, Inc. and Thomas Lawrence
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Welte v. Janssen Research & Development, LLC f/k/a Johnson and Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development, LLC, et al.
as 2:2016cv09280
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lawrence Welte
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Abualsaud et al v. Janssen Research & Development LLC, et al
as 2:2016cv06571
Plaintiff:
Farid Mohamed Abualsaud , Adelbart Seymour Banks , Valerie Beasley-Ruffin and others
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare LLC, Bayer Healthcare AG, Bayer Pharma AG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States v. Martin Lawrence
as 16-2056
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Martin Thomas Lawrence
Floyd v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00429
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lawrence Floyd
Defendant:
Bharat Shah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stoops v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01014
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lawrence Stoops
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stoops v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv02568
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lawrence Stoops
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
