Cases 21 - 30 of 31
US v. Timothy Nixon
as 09-5013
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
TIMOTHY LEROY NIXON
Straeten v. Roper et al
as 4:2009cv01280
Plaintiff:
Timothy Leroy Straeten
Defendant:
Don Roper, Sharon Gifford, Kay Klein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Straeten v. Roper et al
as 4:2009cv01184
Plaintiff:
Timothy Leroy Straeten
Defendant:
Don Roper, Joe Arcan, Morgan Warren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Straeten v. Roper et al
as 4:2009cv01132
Plaintiff:
Timothy Leroy Straeten
Defendant:
Don Roper, Larry Crawford, Unknown Sanscraw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HEISKELL et al v. AQUA-CHEM, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv70147
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY LEROY HEISKELL and REBECCA J. HEISKELL
Defendant:
AQUA-CHEM, INC., BORG-WARNER MORSE TEC, INC., CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Straeten v. Roper et al
as 4:2009cv00812
Plaintiff:
Timothy Leroy Straeten
Defendant:
Don Roper, Kay Klein, Jerry Cartrette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Timothy Leroy Heiskell, et al. v. Aqua-Chem, Inc., et al.
as NCW/1:09-CV-00154
Plaintiff:
Timothy Leroy Heiskell
Defendant:
Aqua-Chem, Inc
Heiskell et al v. Aqua-Chem, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00154
Plaintiff:
Timothy Leroy Heiskell and Rebecca J. Heiskell
Defendant:
Aqua-Chem, Inc., Borg-Warner Morse TEC, Inc., CertainTeed Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
LeRoy v. Flow Dynamics, Inc.
as 2:2008cv00721
Defendant:
Flow Dynamics, Inc. and Flow Dynamics, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Timothy LeRoy
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Garcia v. Black et al
as 1:2008cv02536
Plaintiff:
Miguel A. Garcia
Defendant:
Timothy Leroy Black and CBF Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
