Cases 21 - 30 of 340
Lewis v. US Government
as 5:2023cv00346
Plaintiff:
Shanee A. Lewis
Defendant:
US Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cobble v. US Government et al
as 6:2023cv00648
Plaintiff:
Daniel Cobble, Johnathan Wayne Plemons, Daniel Castleberry and others
Defendant:
US Government, US BOP, US BOP Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Mansouri v. The US Government et al
as 1:2023cv00785
Plaintiff:
Amine Mansouri
Defendant:
The US Government, The City of New York, The Police Department of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rodriguez-Flores, et al v. United States Government, et al
as 23-1065
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ORLANDO RODRIGUEZ-FLORES and ALICIA AYBAR-ROSADO
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Defendant:
US GOVERNMENT, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ROSA EMILIA RODRIGUEZ-VELEZ and others
JOHNSON v. BRAGG et al
as 4:2022cv00182
Petitioner:
JARREL LEE JOHNSON
Respondent:
Warden TRAVIS BRAGG, CHARLES LEMON, DAVID ANDREW COOK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JOHNSON v. BRAGG et al
as 4:2022cv00181
Petitioner:
JARREL LEE JOHNSON
Respondent:
Warden TRAVIS BRAGG, CHARLES LEMON, DAVID ANDREW COOK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Bragg et al
as 5:2022cv03980
Petitioner:
Jarrel Lee Johnson
Respondent:
Travis Bragg, David Andrew Cook, Charles Lemon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Akopyan v. US Government
as 1:2022cv05789
Plaintiff:
Areg Akopyan
Defendant:
US Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Henderson v. US Census et al
as 1:2022cv00709
Plaintiff:
Lee AJ Henderson
Defendant:
US Census, US Government, U.S. Census and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
