Cases 21 - 30 of 83
Kelley v. Riley et al
as 0:2019cv00827
Defendant:
Captain Yolanda Brown, Lt. Tecorrie Garvin, Lt. Travis Pressley and others
Plaintiff:
James H. Kelley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Riley et al
as 0:2019cv00826
Defendant:
Captain Yolanda Brown, Lt. Tecorrie Garvin, Lt. Travis Pressley and others
Plaintiff:
Lola Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yahweh v. Clarke et al
as 1:2018cv01076
Defendant:
Ms. Ansah, Foe Two, Dr. Woodrow A. Myers and others
Plaintiff:
Yeshua Emanuel Yahweh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel v. Snyder's-Lance, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00058
Plaintiff:
Beth A. Daniel
Defendant:
Snyder's-Lance, Inc., Brian J. Driscoll, James W. Johnston and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Kendall v. Snyder's-Lance, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00051
Plaintiff:
Martin Kendall
Defendant:
Snyder's-Lance, Inc., James W. Johnston, Brian J. Driscoll and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Sciabacucchi v. Snyder's-Lance, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00049
Plaintiff:
Matthew Sciabacucchi
Defendant:
Snyder's-Lance, Inc., Jeffrey A. Atkins, Peter P. Brubaker and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Shaev Profit Sharing Account v. Snyder's-Lance, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00039
Plaintiff:
David B. Shaev Profit Sharing Account
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Atkins, Snyder's-Lance, Inc., Peter P. Brubaker and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Jehovah v. Clarke et al
as 1:2017cv01307
Plaintiff:
Jesus Emmanuel Jehovah
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, John M. Jabe, Arnold David Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 2:2017cv09355
Plaintiff:
Delores V. Jackson
Defendant:
Sanofi S.A., Aventis Pharma S.A., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv04017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
