Cases 21 - 30 of 1,397
Tahbaz et al v. Vigilant Insurance Company et al
as 3:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Morad Tahbaz and Vida Tahbaz
Defendant:
Vigilant Insurance Company and Federal Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Vigil v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00502
Plaintiff:
Della Vigil
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Vigil v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Amanda Marie Vigil
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Cleveland v. Van Beek et al
as 1:2023cv03180
Plaintiff:
Albert E. Cleveland, III and Albert (I) E. Cleveland, III
Defendant:
James Van Beek, James (I) Van Beek, Gregory Van Wyk and others
Laycock v. Vigil-Richards et al
as 1:2023cv01050
Plaintiff:
Naomi Laycock
Defendant:
Jessica Vigil-Richards, Jane Doe Garcia, Laura Sedillo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Vigil v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
as 0:2023cv03853
Plaintiff:
Jill Vigil
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Vigil Rivera v. Garland
as 21-148
Petitioner:
WILLIAM ALEXANDER VIGIL RIVERA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Johnson (PS) v. Lepe et al
as 1:2023cv03128
Petitioner:
Derrick Johnson
Respondent:
Lepe, Lim A Valas, Vigil and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Vigil v. Alaska Airlines, Inc.
as 4:2023cv05701
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Vigil
Defendant:
Alaska Airlines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
