Cases 21 - 30 of 59
Charles Woolsey v. William Wilson, et al
as 20-1372
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES M. WOOLSEY
Defendant / Appellee:
SARA M. REVELL, WILLIAM E. WILSON, CHRISTOPHER MCCOY and others
NELSON V. BARR et al
as 1:2020cv00557
Defendant:
WILLIAM P. BARR, JOHN DOES I-X, UTTAM DHILLON and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Nelson
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
BERNARD v. BARR et al
as 1:2020cv00474
Defendant:
WILLIAM P. BARR, JOSEPH MCCLAIN, JEFFREY E. KRUEGER and others
Not Classified By Court:
JOHN 1-9 DOES and WILLIAM E. WILSON, M.D.
Plaintiff:
BRANDON BERNARD
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
HOLDER v. BARR et al
as 1:2019cv03520
Defendant:
UTTAM DHILLON, KATHLEEN HAWK SAWYER, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
Norris G. Holder, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PURKEY v. BARR et al
as 1:2019cv03214
Defendant:
JOHN DOES I-X, KATHLEEN HAWK SAWYER, T.J. WATSON and others
Plaintiff:
WESLEY IRA PURKEY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
INGRAM v. WATSON et al
as 2:2019cv00486
Defendant:
CRANFORD, THOMPSON, WILLIAM E. WILSON and others
Plaintiff:
LEROY NATHANIEL INGRAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LEE v. BARR et al
as 1:2019cv02559
Defendant:
JOHN DOES I-X, UTTAM DHILLON, KATHLEEN HAWK SAWYER and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LEWIS LEE
Not Classified By Court:
DUSTIN LEE HONKEN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
AYALA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2019cv00357
Defendant:
WILLIAM E. WILSON, DOUGLAS KRUSE, KLINT STANDER and others
Plaintiff:
SALOMON AYALA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PURKEY v. UNDERWOOD et al
as 2:2019cv00355
Defendant:
WILLIAM E. WILSON, UNITED STATES, J. T. WATSON and others
Plaintiff:
WESLEY I. PURKEY
Not Yet Classified:
JOHN R. MALEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
AYALA v. KRUSE et al
as 2:2019cv00348
Defendant:
WILLIAM E. WILSON, DOUGLAS KRUSE, KLINT STANDER and others
Plaintiff:
SALOMON AYALA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
