Cases 21 - 30 of 370
Harmon v. Walker et al
as 1:2023cv00231
Plaintiff:
Thomas L. Harmon and Thomas L Harmon
Defendant:
Jessica Walker, Stacy Beam, Noble County Probation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
WALKER v. ARMARK FOOD SERVICES et al
as 1:2023cv00573
Plaintiff:
RAFAEL L. WALKER
Defendant:
ARMARK FOOD SERVICES, FRANK VANIHEL, CHRIS HOLCOMB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALKER v. GILSTRAP et al
as 2:2023cv00150
Plaintiff:
RAFAEL L. WALKER
Defendant:
DAVID GILSTRAP, FAUST, JACKIE BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYD v. CUMMINGS et al
as 1:2023cv00494
Plaintiff:
DEREK BOYD
Defendant:
RODNEY CUMMINGS, COURTNEY STATON, MADISON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISIONER'S and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALKER v. LEOHR et al
as 2:2023cv00122
Plaintiff:
RAFAEL L. WALKER
Defendant:
MATT LEOHR and FRANK VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2023cv00203
Plaintiff:
Timothy E King
Defendant:
John Galipeau, Warr, Timothy Darenski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYD v. CUMMINGS et al
as 2:2023cv00105
Plaintiff:
DEREK BOYD
Defendant:
RODNEY CUMMINGS, COURTNEY STATON, MADISON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WALKER v. DICKE et al
as 3:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN MATTHEW WALKER
Defendant:
GARY DICKE, JANOSA LAZ, STELLA BLAIRE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCMILLAN et al v. GARRISON et al
as 2:2023cv00056
Plaintiff:
RAHEEM H. MCMILLAN, L. M. and K. S.
Defendant:
WILLIAM GARRISON, MEGAN ONEY, STEPHEN WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
