Cases 21 - 30 of 31
BANKS v. MARTINEZ et al
as 1:2019cv00014
Defendant:
OFFICER M. D. MARTINEZ, G. ISENHOUR, 2 HOMICIDE DETECTIVES and others
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS ALVIN BANKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUCKER v. KIVETT et al
as 1:2018cv00897
Defendant:
SHERIFF SCHATZMAN, CPL. KIVETT, CAPT. GUARD SETTLE and others
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS TUCKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCALLISTER v. WINSTON-SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2018cv00745
Defendant:
RICHARD GOTTLIEB, SGT D. T. LENTZ, ELISABETH FROST DRESEL and others
Plaintiff:
ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YOUNG v. ROUNTREE et al
as 1:2017cv00838
Plaintiff:
JAMES JETER JR YOUNG
Defendant:
BARRY ROUNTREE and WINSTON SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOE v. WINSTON-SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2016cv00068
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEE EARL JOE
Defendant:
WINSTON-SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT and J. E. SWAIM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOE v. WINSTON SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2015cv00668
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEE EARL JOE
Defendant:
WINSTON SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT and J. E. SWAIM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOINER v. WINSTON SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2012cv01235
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND DAKIM HARRIS JOINER
Defendant:
WINSTON SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT, ANDREW KEEVER and WINSTON SALEM COURTHOUSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. WINSTON-SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2010cv00917
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND MILLER
Defendant:
WINSTON-SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT and BE-WENZEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WARDLOW v. PLEASANT et al
as 1:2009cv00381
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LEWIS WARDLOW
Defendant:
J.B. PLEASANT, J.J. BAXTER and WINSTON-SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kim Jessup v. Theodore Hill
as 09-6348
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KIM TYRONE JESSUP
Defendant - Appellee:
THEODORE DAVID HILL, Detective, JOHN PAUL TIMBERLAKE, Detective, STEVEN WAYNE TOLLIE, Corporal and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
