Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00655
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
BBG SURGICAL, LLC v. PRO THERAPY SUPPLIES, LLC, et al
as 3:2016cv04553
Plaintiff:
BBG SURGICAL, LLC
Defendant:
PRO THERAPY SUPPLIES, LLC and SEAN TANG
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv11050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Humphrey v. BBG North, LLC d/b/a Taco Bell (Bolivar, TN Franchisee)
as 1:2015cv01075
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Humphrey
Defendant:
BBG North, LLC d/b/a Taco Bell (Bolivar, TN Franchisee)
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615
Inland Empire Waterkeeper et al v. Mission Clay Products LLC, et al
as 5:2014cv01286
Defendant:
BBG KRG, Inc., MC Industries, LLC, MCP Industries, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Inland Empire Waterkeeper and Orange County Coastkeeper
Akers v. BBG North LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00237
Plaintiff:
Thomas B. Akers
Defendant:
BBG North LLC, Barrett T.B., Inc. and Barrett Bros. Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02024
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00328
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BBG, Ltd. v. Roka Akor San Francisco, LLC et al
as 3:2012cv04761
Plaintiff:
BBG, Ltd.
Defendant:
Roka Akor San Francisco, LLC and JNK Concepts, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Vlastimil Sajfr, et al v. BBG Communications, Inc., et al
as 12-55263
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VLASTIMIL SAJFR, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and DAVID KEEPORTS, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
BBG COMMUNICATIONS, INC. and DOES, 1-10 Inclusive
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
