Cases 31 - 40 of 167
Richardson v. Lall et al
as 1:2022cv01831
Plaintiff:
Raymond Remell Richardson, Jr.
Defendant:
Judge J. Jessy Lall, Sergeant Francious, M.P. Officer Strout and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Greathouse v. Barlett et al
as 2:2022cv00012
Plaintiff:
Adam Lee Greathouse
Defendant:
Benjamin M. Barlett, Matthew Kellison, Dale Broadwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hanson-Gales v. Scott County Jail et al
as 4:2022cv00051
Plaintiff:
Aaron Hanson-Gales
Defendant:
Scott County Jail, Adam Lee, Devin Reeves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Greathouse v. Wilson
as 2:2022cv00001
Plaintiff:
Adam Lee Greathouse
Defendant:
Matthew Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STURDIVANT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv02612
Plaintiff:
ADAM LEE STURDIVANT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Howard v. Scott County Jail et al
as 4:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
Malachi Howard
Defendant:
Scott County Jail, Adam Lee, Devin Reeves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lacey v. McNea
as 0:2021cv02525
Plaintiff:
Tait Matthew Lacey
Defendant:
Adam Lee McNea
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAGBY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv49739
Plaintiff:
ADAM LEE BAGBY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Richey v. Holden
as 21-10673
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Adam Lee Richey
Defendant / Appellee:
Eric Holden, Jay Holden, Billy Parker and others
Richey v. Holden et al
as 3:2021cv01012
Defendant:
Billy Parker, Jay Holden, Unknown Female Polygraph Examiner and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Lee Richey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
