Cases 31 - 40 of 123
USA v. Abdul Abdul Kareem
as 21-10315
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ABDUL MALIK ABDUL KAREEM, AKA Decarus Thomas
WILLIAMS v. WHITTINGTON
as 5:2021cv00305
Plaintiff:
GRADY RENARD WILLIAMS, JR and ABDUL MALIK BEY
Defendant:
PUBLIC OFFICIAL LAWRENCE WHITTINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Francis Davis
as 21-6960
Defendant / Appellant:
FRANCIS CURTIS DAVIS, a/k/a Abdul-Malik Lbnfrancis As-Salafi
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 5:2021cv00061
Plaintiff:
ABDUL MALIK BEY and GRADY RENARD WILLIAMS, JR
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Williams (Campbell)
as 20-4204
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Anderson King, AKA Hasan Abdul-Malik, Najimah Abdul Cox, Craig Williams and others
Defendant / Appellant:
George Campbell, AKA Roland Campell, AKA Ramadan
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv05538
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
USA v. Abdul Abdul Kareem
as 20-10177
Defendant / Appellee:
ABDUL MALIK ABDUL KAREEM, AKA Decarus Thomas
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Abdul Abdul Kareem
as 20-10155
Defendant / Appellant:
ABDUL MALIK ABDUL KAREEM, AKA Decarus Thomas
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Abdul Abdul Kareem
as 20-10106
Defendant / Appellant:
ABDUL MALIK ABDUL KAREEM, AKA Decarus Thomas
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
WILLIAMS v. WARD et al
as 5:2020cv00041
Petitioner:
GRADY RENARD WILLIAMS, JR and ABDUL MALIK BEY
Respondent:
TIMOTHY C WARD and GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
