Cases 1 - 10 of 122
As-Salafi v. Brown
as 3:2024cv00053
Petitioner:
Abdul-Malik As-Salafi
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
TAMBE BUTLER v. ABDUL-MALIK
as 1:2024cv00555
Plaintiff:
ANNEH TAMBE BUTLER
Defendant:
HAKIM KHALIL ABDUL-MALIK
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Abdul-Malik v. Vasto et al
as 1:2023cv01479
Plaintiff:
Ryan Abdul-Malik
Defendant:
Nicholas Vasto and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
US v. Francis Davis
as 23-7153
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
FRANCIS CURTIS DAVIS, a/k/a Abdul-Malik Francis As-Salafi
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv12809
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
BEY v. WHITTINGTON, et al.
as 5:2023cv00354
Plaintiff:
ABDUL MALIK BEY
Defendant:
LAWRENCE WHITTINGTON, WARDEN CHARLES MIMS, TIMOTHY SALES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taing v. Bar at 66 Greenpoint LLC et al
as 1:2023cv06681
Plaintiff:
Vandy Taing
Defendant:
Bar at 66 Greenpoint LLC and Ibraheem Abdul-Malik
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
MALIK v. AMERICAN BANKERS INSURANCE COMPANY OF FLORIDA, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv16240
Plaintiff:
M.D. ABDUL MALIK
Defendant:
AMERICAN BANKERS INSURANCE COMPANY OF FLORIDA, INC. and GEICO INSURANCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4001 National Insurance Flood Act
BEY et al v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 5:2023cv00322
Plaintiff:
ABDUL MALIK BEY, GRADY RENARD WILLIAMS, JR and GRADY RENARD WILLIAMS , JR
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Francis Davis v. Warden Brown
as 23-6757
Petitioner / Appellant:
ABDUL-MALIK FRANCIS AS-SALAFI, a/k/a Francis Curtis Davis
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN BROWN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
