Cases 31 - 40 of 1,473
Williams v. Core Civic, Inc. et al.
as 1:2023cv02387
Plaintiff:
Devon C. Williams
Defendant:
Core Civic, Inc., Acting Warden Misty Mackey, Sgt. fnu Wygant and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hill v. Allen
as 4:2024cv00005
Petitioner:
Derek A. Hill
Respondent:
Acting Warden Trent Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Noble v. Napier
as 23-1994
Petitioner / Appellant:
THOMAS E. NOBLE
Respondent / Appellee:
STEPHANIE NAPIER, Acting Warden, FMC Devens
Johnson v. State of California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation et al
as 4:2023cv06528
Plaintiff:
Duane Johnson
Defendant:
State of California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, San Quentin State Prison, Ralph Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miguel Flores Jr. v. Bryan D. Phillips
as 2:2023cv09998
Petitioner:
Miguel Flores, Jr.
Respondent:
Acting Warden Bryan D. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lundy v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv03809
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lundy
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., A. Crain, IDOC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Espinal v. Ping
as 3:2023cv03124
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Espinal
Defendant:
Acting Warden L. Ping
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ruben Adrian Cortes, Jr. v. Stephen Smith
as 2:2023cv09999
Petitioner:
Ruben Adrian Cortes, Jr
Respondent:
Acting Warden Stephen Smith and Stephen Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Falcone v. McManus et al
as 4:2023cv01196
Petitioner:
Michael Falcone
Respondent:
Acting Warden McManus, Bureau of Prisons and Acting Warden M. Cordova
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
