Cases 31 - 40 of 100
United States of America v. Donald (Hayes)
as 25-933
Defendant:
ERIC HAYES, TREVON WRIGHT, TRAVON JONES and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Donald (Jones)
as 25-761
Defendant:
TRAVON JONES, TREVON WRIGHT, ERIC HAYES and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Garretson Resolution Group, Inc. v. Bolla et al
as 3:2025cv02836
Plaintiff:
Garretson Resolution Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Paul Jerry Bolla, Phil Batchelor, Barbara Bowen and others
Cross-Complainant:
Paul Jerry Bolla
Cross-Defendant:
John Roeser, Andrea Keaton, The George and Lena Valente Foundation and others
Counter-Claimant:
Paul Jerry Bolla
Counter-Defendant:
Garretson Resolution Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
United States of America v. Donald (Wright)
as 25-608
Defendant:
TREVON WRIGHT, ERIC HAYES, TRAVON JONES and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Batchelor v. Laguines et al
as 2:2025cv00433
Plaintiff:
James Batchelor
Defendant:
Nationwide Transport, Francisco N. Languines and Marcos A. Huerta Duenas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
United States of America v. Donald
as 25-455
Defendant:
TREVON WRIGHT, ERIC HAYES, TRAVON JONES and others
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Lane, Jr. v. Smith
as 1:2025cv00192
Petitioner:
Dewaune Lamont Lane Jr.
Respondent:
Linda Batchelor Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lane Jr. v. Smith
as 7:2025cv00066
Petitioner:
Dewaune Lamont Lane Jr.
Respondent:
Linda Batchelor Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Batchelor
as 5:2025cv00024
Plaintiff:
Brandie Davis
Defendant:
Jonathan Batchelor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taylor v. Alexis
as 24-3350
Defendant:
NYDOCS Commissioner CYNTHIA BRANN, RNDC Co. JENKINGS, MDC WHO WORK THERE IN LEGAL DIV DEPT VISITS and others
Plaintiff:
ROY TAYLOR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
