Cases 31 - 40 of 44
FRANKLIN et al v. THE CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv63831
Plaintiff:
THOMAS KENNY FRANKLIN and ELVIRA C. FRANKLIN
Defendant:
THE CELOTEX CORPORATION , GAF CORPORATION , OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Franklin v. Department of Corrections
as 0:2011cv60306
Plaintiff:
Myron C Franklin
Defendant:
Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FRANKLIN et al v. ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv79094
Plaintiff:
JAMES B. FRANKLIN and HELEN C. FRANKLIN
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY, COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC., EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adams et al v. Columbus Lumber Company, LLC et al
as 3:2010cv00475
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Adams , Olgert Akmenkalas , Pertrell Arnold and others
Defendant:
Columbus Lumber Company, LLC, Brookhaven Sawmill Company, H. Ross Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv06265
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Pruco Securities LLC v. Franklin et al
as 3:2010cv01842
Plaintiff:
Pruco Securities LLC
Defendant:
Jared R Franklin, Justin C Franklin, Jordan B Franklin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00147
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Franklin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2010cv06191
Plaintiff:
Cozzetta C. Franklin
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Tarin v. Franklin
as 1:2009cv00808
Plaintiff:
Arthur Tarin
Defendant:
D C Franklin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Williams v. Massey, et al
as 08-41223
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WOODROW WILSON WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
LLOYD MASSEY, Warden, Polunsky Unit, L BAILEY, Disciplinary Hearing Officer, HINDSMAN, Lieutenant and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
