Cases 31 - 40 of 83
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2017cv00460
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv00802
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2015cv00377
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Guinn et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 3:2013cv04780
In Re:
PLAVIX PRODUCT LIABILITY AND MARKETING LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
Dale Guinn, Needham O. Bunn, Nancy L. Bunn and others
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and MCKESSON CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Matthews et al v. Coloplast Corp.
as 2:2013cv16592
Plaintiff:
Pamela C. Matthews and Jerry D. Matthews
Defendant:
Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Matthews et al v. Coloplast Corp.
as WVS/2:13-cv-16592
Plaintiff:
Pamela C. Matthews and Jerry D. Matthews
Defendant:
Coloplast Corp.
Ingram et al v. BP Exploration & Production Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv01552
Plaintiff:
Yancy Edward Ingram , Christola Ann Jackson , Hilal A. Jaouhari and others
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production, Inc., BP America Production Company, BP p.l.c. and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 2701 - Oil Pollution Act
Guinn et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 3:2013cv01487
Plaintiff:
Dale Guinn , Needham O. Bunn , Nancy L. Bunn and others
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and McKesson Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Griffin v. Matthews
as 4:2012cv00662
Plaintiff:
Amber Griffin
Defendant:
Janet C Matthews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Bryan v. Matthews
as 3:2012cv02316
Plaintiff:
Edward Bryan
Defendant:
Carolyn C Matthews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
