Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Martin et al v. Takata Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv00092
Plaintiff:
Roy Martin , Mario Cervantes , Carolyn Miller and others
Defendant:
Takata Corporation, TK Holdings Inc, Highland Industries Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Human Relations Commission et al
as 3:2014cv00047
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnson
Defendant:
Human Relations Commission, Carolyn Miller Cooper and Martha Lawfer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Miller et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as WVS/2:13-cv-22387
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Miller and Rickey Miller
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc.
Miller et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2013cv22387
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Miller and Rickey Miller
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00399
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 157
Miller v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 5:2010cv00529
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Miller
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
McGee et al v. Thor Industries, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv07830
Plaintiff:
Ella McGee, Ella McGee, Ella McGee and others
Defendant:
Thor Industries, Inc., Bechtel National Inc., CH2M Hill Construction, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Southeast Supply Header, LLC v. 40 acres in Jones County, Mississippi et al
as 2:2007cv00337
Plaintiff:
Southeast Supply Header, LLC, Southeast Supply Header, LLC, Southeast Supply Header, LLC and others
Defendant:
40 acres in Jones County, Mississippi, Bruce S. Rawls, Elaine Rawls and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
