Cases 31 - 40 of 354
CASEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv18751
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ANTHONY CASEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RSCC Wire & Cable LLC v. USDC-CASF
as 22-70211
Not Classified By Court:
In re: RSCC WIRE & CABLE LLC, CHARLES ANTHONY SPECK, JULIE CRYSTAL ANDERSON and others
Petitioner:
RSCC WIRE & CABLE LLC
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Tutankhaman v. Hill
as 2:2022cv01502
Plaintiff:
King Michael Tutankhaman, Grand Royal Prince Michael Dumpledore III and Michael Maxwell Hill
Defendant:
Charles Anthony Hill
Hamilton et al v. Farmers Property and Casualty Insurance Company
as 2:2022cv02544
Plaintiff:
Charles Anthony Hamilton and De Juanna Williams Hamilton
Defendant:
Farmers Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Hill v. Harvey et al
as 2:2022cv01219
Plaintiff:
Michael Maxwell Hill, King Michael Tutankhaman and Grand Royal Prince Michael Dompledore, III
Defendant:
Markus Harvey, Marcos Harvey, Cameron Rye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
PARKER v WARD et al
as 7:2022cv00074
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ANTHONY PARKER, JR
Defendant:
TIMOTHY WARD, STAN SHEPHERD, SHAWN EMMONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles Tiggett v. USA
as 22-12397
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHARLES ANTHONY TIGGETT, a.k.a. James McGowan, a.k.a. James McGowen
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Tiggett v. United States of America
as 8:2022cv01406
Plaintiff:
Charles Anthony Tiggett
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
KING v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2022cv00405
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CHARLES ANTHONY KING
Defendant:
TERRY JOHNSON, LIETENANT MCCLURE, N. TICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
