Cases 31 - 40 of 66
Finance of America Reverse LLC v. The Estate of Carlos Manuel Ortiz-Pena et al.
as 3:2016cv02531
Plaintiff:
Finance of America Reverse LLC
Defendant:
The Estate of Carlos Manuel Ortiz-Pena, Maria Luisa Carmona de Ortiz, Centro de Recaudacion de Ingresos Municipales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Vargas-Ortiz v. USA
as 1:2016cv00283
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Vargas-Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02392
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ortz-Santiago et al v. Hospital Episcopal San Lucas, Inc.
as 3:2016cv01099
Plaintiff:
Delca I. Ortiz-Santiago , Loira E. Ortiz-Santiago and Carlos R. Ortiz-Santiago
Defendant:
Hospital Episcopal San Lucas, Inc., Grupo HIMA San Pablo, Inc., Edgardo Bermudez-Moreno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
USA v. Carlos Perez-Ortiz
as 15-41426
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CARLOS PEREZ-ORTIZ
Ortiz-Zuniga v. Lynch
as 15-9569
Petitioner:
CARLOS IGNACIO ORTIZ-ZUNIGA
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, United States Attorney General
US v. Rivera-Izquierdo
as 15-1620
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
JORGE RIVERA-IZQUIERDO
Interested Party:
FIDEL LOZADA, FIDEL LOZADA, SR., EDGARDO VIDAL-CEDA and others
Interested Party - Movant:
CARLOS ROBERTO-ORTIZ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00939
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00937
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
