Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 147
Foust v. Clarke
as 3:2020cv03253
Respondent: Daniel Clarke
Petitioner: David Foust
Not Classified By Court: Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dughetti v. I.D.O.C. et al
as 3:2020cv03222
Plaintiff: Eric Robert Dughetti
Defendant: Rob Jeffries, IDOC and Daniel Clarke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. City of Henderson, Texas et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2020cv00468
Defendant: City of Henderson, Texas, Trudy McGill and Rusk County, Texas
Plaintiff: Jesse Daniel Clark, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dughetti v. I.D.O.C. et al
as 1:2020cv04860
Plaintiff: Eric Robert Dughetti
Defendant: I.D.O.C., Rob Jeffries and Daniel Clarke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nathan Daniel Clark v. Paul Schnell, et al
as 20-2436
Respondent / Appellee: Shannon Reimann, Warden and Paul Schnell, Minnesota Department of Corrections Commissioner
Petitioner / Appellant: Nathan Daniel Clark
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv01609
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Glucksmann v. Clarke We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv02946
Respondent: Daniel Clarke
Petitioner: Nicolas Glucksmann and Nicholas E. Glucksmann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CLARK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv87995
Defendant: AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff: KEEGAN DANIEL CLARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mrazek v. Clarke We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv02698
Petitioner: Craig Mrazek
Respondent: Daniel Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mrazek v. Clarke
as 3:2020cv03109
Petitioner: Craig Mrazek
Respondent: Daniel Clarke
Not Classified By Court: Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?