Cases 31 - 40 of 188
Adams v. Middlesex County, et al
as 2:2020cv02112
Plaintiff:
Brandon G Adams
Defendant:
Mathew Johnson, Crossmark, Daniel H Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adams v. Raghnal et al
as 2:2020cv01982
Defendant:
Harriet E Raghnal, Dave Monroe, Rebecca L Burton and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon G Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv01362
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL MORRIS BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROWN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2020cv05007
Plaintiff:
DANIEL GEORGE BROWN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Brown v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv00295
Defendant:
Medtronic Logistics, LLC, Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co., Medtronic, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel E Brown and Daniel E. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROWN JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv84456
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL R BROWN JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROWN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv11589
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LEE BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States v. Daniel Brown, Jr.
as 20-2053
Defendant / Appellee:
Daniel Lynn Brown, Jr.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
United States of America
Day v. PPE Casino Resort Maryland LLC
as 1:2020cv01120
Defendant:
PPE Casino Resort Maryland LLC
Plaintiff:
Laura A. Day, Danielle Marie Brown, Amanda Vogtman and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Daniel Brown v. United States Department of Ho, et al
as 20-1883
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL G. BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
