Cases 31 - 40 of 607
HALE v. HALE et al
as 3:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LEE HALE
Defendant:
SHERIFF JAMES HALE and OCONEE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Hill et al
as 5:2023cv00686
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Mitchell
Defendant:
Sara Elizabeth Hill, Catina R Drywater, Rachel Marie Dallis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale v. Hale et al
as 2:2023cv00151
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Hale
Defendant:
Sheriff James Hale and Oconee County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Mitchell
as 23-7052
Petitioner:
In re: DANIEL LEE MITCHELL
Respondent:
JASON CHENNAULT, Sheriff, Cherokee County and SARA HILL, Cherokee Nation Attorney General
Brown v. Barrone et al
as 3:2023cv50259
Plaintiff:
John E. Brown
Defendant:
Daniel Lee Barrone and Sharon Barrone-Lyford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mitchell v. Parris, et al
as 23-5081
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL LEE MITCHELL
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFERY BRYANT JONES, Attorney Cherokee Nation, individual capacity, ZACHARY STARKEY, Captain Rogers County Sheriff Department, individual capacity, DETENTION OFFICER MALLOT, Rogers County Sheriff Department, individual capacity and others
Mitchell v. Barteaux
as 4:2023cv00242
Petitioner:
Daniel Lee Mitchell
Respondent:
Cherokee Nation
Defendant:
T Luke Barteaux
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Miles v. Williamson County Sheriff's Office
as 3:2023cv00528
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Miles
Defendant:
Williamson County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cincoski v. Weatherington
as 2:2023cv02065
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Cincoski
Defendant:
Dr. Weatherington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
