Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Howard Hill, II v. Z. Edinger, et al
as 15-1728
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HOWARD L. HILL, II
Defendant - Appellee:
C/O Z. EDINGER, J. FOURA, Activities Lieutenant, J. SEEBA and others
Good v. Dishman et al
as 8:2014cv03075
Plaintiff:
Howard E. Good
Defendant:
Traci Renee Dishman, Larry L. Eger, Florida Public Defender's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clayton v. Good
as 1:2014cv00794
Plaintiff:
Gloria Ann Clayton
Defendant:
Anne E. Good
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Goode et al v. County Waste of Virginia, LLC
as 3:2014mc00002
Plaintiff:
Douglas E. Goode, Sr. , George T. Hodges , Kelvin Jones and others
Defendant:
County Waste of Virginia, LLC
Martin v. Good et al
as 1:2013cv04877
Petitioner:
James Martin
Respondent:
George E. Good
Defendant:
Lisa Madigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Serrano v. Hoffa et al
as 3:2013cv00038
Plaintiff:
Candido Serrano
Defendant:
S Hoffa, S Argueta, E Good and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Pope v. Edinger et al
as 1:2011cv01608
Plaintiff:
Irvin Lee Pope
Defendant:
Matt Edinger, J Flemming, D Archey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Abbott et al v. Tonawanda Coke Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv00549
Plaintiff:
Jennifer L. Abbott , Anthony Adimey , Dana Allen and others
Defendant:
Tonawanda Coke Corporation , James Donald Crane and Does 1 through 100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gooding v. Marion County
as 5:2010cv00431
Petitioner:
James E Gooding
Respondent:
Marion County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Goods v. Housing Authority of Baltimore City
as 1:2010cv02293
Plaintiff:
Daron E. Goods
Defendant:
Housing Authority of Baltimore City
Movant:
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and United States of America
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
