Cases 31 - 40 of 246
Smith et al v. Garcia et al
as 1:2021cv00578
Defendant:
E. Garcia, J. Hines and John/Jane Doe
Plaintiff:
Tiffany McKelvy and Yandielle Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(SS) Garcia v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv01366
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Georgina E. Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
(PC) Arrant v. Santoro et al
as 1:2020cv01253
Defendant:
U. Valencia, O. Herrera, E. Garcia and others
Plaintiff:
Melvin R. Arrant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 3.683 ACRES OF LAND MORE OR LESS et al
as 7:2020cv00258
Defendant:
3.683 ACRES OF LAND MORE OR LESS, Magda Ramirez, Gloria Garcia Chapa and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
Kellen John Clarke v. San Luis Obispo County Sheriff Dept. et al
as 2:2020cv08205
Plaintiff:
Kellen John Clarke
Defendant:
Doss, E. Garcia, Brenda Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quinones-Cedeno v. Antonelli et al
as 5:2020cv00198
Defendant:
E. Garcia, Paul Adams, Ms. M. Thompkis and others
Plaintiff:
Lazaro Quinones-Cedeno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Garcia v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020at00732
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Georgina E. Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
(PC) Riley v. Guerrero et al
as 1:2020cv01097
Defendant:
E. Garcia, J. Mendez, A. Guerrero and others
Plaintiff:
Shannon Riley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ana E. Garcia Gomez v. Andrew Saul
as 2:2020cv06200
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Ana E. Garcia Gomez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Michael Patton v. Flores, et al
as 20-55618
Defendant / Appellee:
FLORES, Officer, Counselor / CCII Staff - Commission Committee, L. TERRONEZ, Correctional Officer, MILLER, Correctional Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL PATTON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
