Cases 31 - 40 of 96
Lyons v. Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 8:2016cv00093
Plaintiff:
Sarah E. Lyons
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00204
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lyons v. Advance/Newhouse Partnership
as 8:2016cv00067
Plaintiff:
Sarah E. Lyons
Defendant:
Advance/Newhouse Partnership
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Henry Lyons v. F. Wayne Vaught, et al
as 16-1062
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Henry E. Lyons
Defendant:
Leo E. Morton
Defendant - Appellant:
F. Wayne Vaught and Reginald Bassa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv07942
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
United States of America v. Lyons
as 3:2015cv03270
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Kelly E Lyons
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
United States of America v. Lyons et al
as 1:2015cv01397
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
David E. Lyons and Sandra M. Lyons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471
Maryland Higher Education Comm v. The Coalition for Equity
as 15-243
Petitioner:
KEVIN M. O'KEEFE, Chairman of the Maryland Higher Education Commission, in his Official Capacity, JAMES E. LYONS, SR., Secretary of Higher Education of the State of Maryland, in his Official Capacity, STATE OF MARYLAND and others
Respondent:
THE COALITION FOR EQUITY AND EXCELLENCE IN MARYLAND HIGHER EDUCATION, INC., a/k/a The Coalition for Equity and Excellence in Maryland Higher Education, Inc., RASHAAN SIMON, a/k/a Rahsaan Simon, DAVID J. BURTON and others
PENAGALURI et al v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2015cv00876
Plaintiff:
NAGALATHA PENAGALURI and SATISH KUMAR BASETTY
Defendant:
JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, LORETTA LYNCH, JAMES B. COMEY and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Lyons v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv06733
Plaintiff:
Ruth E. Lyons
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.