Cases 31 - 40 of 3,813
Guzman Ovalle et al v. A.B.C. Trade, LLC et al
as 8:2024cv00864
Defendant:
A.B.C. Trade, LLC also known as ABC Trade, LLC doing business as Hot Pot Kitchen, ABC Trade, LLC and Baolan Liang
Plaintiff:
Edin Guzman Ovalle and Jose Ernesto Sanchez Guevara
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Gonzalez Mejia v. Garland
as 24-1774
Petitioner:
HUGO ERNESTO GONZALEZ MEJIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Orozco Mendez
as 24-1685
Defendant:
ERNESTO OROZCO MENDEZ, Seal EE and Gordo
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Telematica Lefic, S.A. De C.V. et al v. Socorro Marin, et al
as 3:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
Telemtica Lefic, S.A. De C.V., Dyntra, S.A. De C.V., Rosa Maria Romero Vargas and others
Defendant:
Antonio J. Socorro Marin and Iquantics Corp.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Aguilar-Quintanilla v. Garland
as 24-60142
Petitioner:
Edgard Ernesto Aguilar-Quintanilla
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Hearns et al v. MEJ Plumbing, LLC et al
as 0:2024cv60434
Plaintiff:
Patrick Hearns, Jr., Danel Phillips, Ernesto Dimitrie and others
Defendant:
MEJ Plumbing, LLC, Jason Cohen, Eric Lazar and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Rincon v. City of Laredo
as 24-40168
Plaintiff:
Ismael Rincon
Defendant:
City of Laredo, Texas, Arturo Benavides, Robert Fernandez, Jr. and others
RIVERA v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv03935
Plaintiff:
ERNESTO RIVERA
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT and DR. IBRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
