Cases 31 - 40 of 77
STEWART et al v. SEBELIUS et al
as 1:2013cv01879
Plaintiff:
JOHN F STEWART and ENCOMPASS DEVELOP, DESIGN & CONSTRUCT, LLC
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, THOMAS PEREZ, JACOB LEW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Stewart v. Melton et al
as 2:2013cv00063
Plaintiff:
Paul F. Stewart
Defendant:
W. B. Melton and Shannon Harvey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. Air Line Pilots Association International (ALPA)
as 0:2013cv61131
Plaintiff:
Allen F. Stewart
Defendant:
Air Line Pilots Association International (ALPA)
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 0151 Railway Labor Act
Stewart v. Colvin
as 2:2013cv00508
Plaintiff:
John F Stewart
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Stewart v. International Playtex Inc
as 8:1986dv02817
Plaintiff:
Ray F Stewart
Defendant:
International Playtex Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Theodore Stewart v. Stephen Sinclair
as 12-35590
Petitioner - Appellant:
THEODORE F. STEWART
Respondent - Appellee:
STEPHEN D. SINCLAIR
Theodore Stewart v. Stephen Sinclair
as 12-71834
Petitioner:
THEODORE F. STEWART
Respondent:
STEPHEN D. SINCLAIR
Allen Stewart v. Spirit Airlines, Inc., et al
as 12-11120
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALLEN F. STEWART
Defendant - Appellee:
SPIRIT AIRLINES, INC., a defendant Corporation, JOHN RICHARD DANCASTER, individually and in his corporate capacity, JOE HOUGHTON, individually and in his corporate capacity and others
:
SERVICE
Stewart v. Spirit Airlines/ALPA, System Board of Adjustment
as 0:2012cv60323
Petitioner:
Allen F. Stewart
Defendant:
Spirit Airlines/ALPA, System Board of Adjustment and Airline Pilots Association, INT'L
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Stewart v. United States of America et al
as 1:2011cv01184
Defendant:
United States of America and Rebecca A. Montgomery
Plaintiff:
Barbara F. Stewart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
