Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Nicholson v. FCI Fairton, NJ
as 9:2009cv00694
Petitioner:
Nyron Nicholson
Respondent:
FCI Fairton, NJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SCOTT v. FCI FAIRTON
as 1:2009cv00929
Respondent:
FCI FAIRTON
Petitioner:
AVAN N. SCOTT
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Samuels v. BOP, et al
as 08-2305
Petitioner - Appellant:
JULIAN SAMUELS
Respondent - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARVEY LAPPIN, HENRY J. SADOWSKI and others
RAZZOLI v. US PAROLE COM'N et al
as 1:2008cv03873
Petitioner:
KEVIN RAZZOLI
Respondent:
US PAROLE COM'N, HARLEY LAPIN, GEORGE W. BUSH and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
COOPER v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2008cv02851
Petitioner:
ANDREW COOPER
Respondent:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION, F.B.O.P. FCI FAIRTON and PAUL SCHULTZ
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Michael Short v. Paul Schultz
as 08-6872
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL SHORT
Respondent - Appellee:
PAUL SCHULTZ, Warden, FCI FAIRTON and BUREAU OF PRISONS
COOPER v. WARDEN PAUL SCHULTZ et al
as 1:2008cv02250
Plaintiff:
ANDREW COOPER
Defendant:
WARDEN PAUL SCHULTZ, F.B.O.P. FCI FAIRTON and U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Short v. Schultz et al
as 7:2008cv00057
Petitioner:
Michael Short
Respondent:
Paul Schultz, FCI Fairton and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Harris v. Miner et al
as 5:2008cv03013
Plaintiff:
Seth H. Harris, Sr
Defendant:
Jonathan C. Miner and FCI Fairton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SHORT v. SCHULTZ et al
as 1:2008cv00186
Petitioner:
MICHAEL SHORT
Respondent:
PAUL SCHULTZ, FCI FAIRTON and BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
