Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Kasmark et al v. DV Technologies Inc
as 2:2009cv00409
Plaintiff:
Raymond E Kasmark, Patrick G Bailey, Dennis K Showers and others
Defendant:
DV Technologies Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Kasmark et al v. Kelly
as 2:2009cv00191
Plaintiff:
Raymond E Kasmark, Patrick G Bailey, Dennis K Showers and others
Defendant:
Tim Kelly
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Kasmark et al v. Grays Electrical Service LLC
as 2:2009cv00172
Plaintiff:
Raymond E Kasmark, Patrick G Bailey, Dennis K Showers and others
Defendant:
Grays Electrical Service LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
WALLACE et al v. VESSEL OSG 192 et al
as 1:2009cv01980
Plaintiff:
ROBERT E. WALLACE, III and ANTOINETTE G. WALLACE
Defendant:
VESSEL OSG 192, OSG 192 LLC, OSG ENTERPRISE LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Moses v. Wallace et al
as 5:2008cv00691
Plaintiff:
Maurice A. Moses, Sr.
Defendant:
G. Wallace and Medical Station
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WALLACE v. MARBERRY
as 2:2008cv00327
Petitioner:
DAVID G WALLACE
Respondent:
H. J. MARBERRY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Charles Wallace v. Warden Chillicothe Correctiona
as 08-3724
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES G. WALLACE
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN CHILLICOTHE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
WILSON v. WALLACE
as 4:2008cv00199
Plaintiff:
RANDY WILSON
Defendant:
DOUGLAS G WALLACE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallace v. Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
as 2:2008cv00393
Petitioner:
Charles G. Wallace
Respondent:
Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2007cv01457
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
