Cases 31 - 40 of 1,442
Grey v. Whitmire
as 8:2024cv00080
Petitioner:
Silas Grey
Respondent:
Don Whitmire
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Grey v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2024cv03009
Plaintiff:
William R. Grey and William R Grey
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
American Southern Homes Holdings LLC, et al v. David Erickson, et al
as 24-10440
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN SOUTHERN HOMES HOLDINGS LLC and ASH-GRAYHAWK LLC
Defendant:
DAVID B. ERICKSON, GH LOT HOLDINGS INC, GH LOT HOLDINGS OF ATLANTA CORPORATION and others
Barrington Pacific LLC v. Daniel Mejia et al
as 2:2024cv01013
Plaintiff:
Barrington Pacific LLC
Defendant:
Daniel Mejia, Stacy Grey and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Grey Rock Gathering & Marketing L L C v. Filron Solutions L L C
as 2:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Grey Rock Gathering and Marketing, LLC and Grey Rock Gathering & Marketing L L C
Defendant:
Filron Solutions, LLC and Filron Solutions L L C
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McGee v. State of California, et al.
as 24-393
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFERSON A. MCGEE
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, GOVERNOR OF CALIFORNIA, ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
