Cases 31 - 40 of 382
Design Gaps Inc et al v. Distinctive Design & Construction LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00197
Plaintiff:
Design Gaps Inc, David Glover and Eva Glover
Defendant:
Distinctive Design & Construction LLC doing business as Distinctive Design LLC, Bryan Reiss, Wendy Reiss and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Design Gaps, Inc. et al v. Shelter, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv04698
Petitioner:
Design Gaps, Inc., David Glover and Eva Glover
Respondent:
Shelter, LLC, Dr. Jason Highsmith and Kacie M. Highsmith
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Patagonia, Inc. v. The Gap, Inc.
as 3:2022cv07437
Plaintiff:
Patagonia, Inc.
Defendant:
The Gap, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv07015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Recog IP LLC v. The Gap, Inc.
as 6:2022cv01261
Plaintiff:
Recog IP LLC
Defendant:
The Gap, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Morrison-Lowe v. The Gap Inc
as 4:2022cv00926
Plaintiff:
Jo Ann Morrison-Lowe
Defendant:
The Gap Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-55957
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Diaz v. The Gap, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv07371
Plaintiff:
Joshua Diaz
Defendant:
The Gap, Inc., Sonia Syngal and Katrina OConnell
Jill Hennessey v. The Gap, Inc., et al
as 22-3187
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jill Hennessey, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
The Gap, Inc. and Old Navy, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03688
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
