Cases 31 - 40 of 641
Anthony Gooden v. Tracy Johnson
as 2:2024cv02648
Petitioner:
Anthony Gooden
Respondent:
Tracy Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
A. v. South Carolina Department of Social Services (SCDSS) et al
as 3:2024cv01303
Plaintiff:
N. A.
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Social Services (SCDSS), Belinda York, Emily Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Amador et al v. South Carolina Department of Social Services (SCDSS) et al
as 3:2024cv01302
Plaintiff:
Narumi Amador and Guarionex Amador
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Social Services (SCDSS), Belinda York, Emily Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Edwards v. Gooden et al
as 4:2024cv04048
Plaintiff:
LaQuadia Edwards
Defendant:
Antoinette Gooden and Kirk Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gooden v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Clifford A. Gooden, III
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00921
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Gera v. Barra et al
as 1:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
Samhita Gera
Defendant:
Mary T. Barra, Paul A. Jacobson, Aneel Bhusri and others
Colburn Kelly v. Cody Jett, et al
as 24-10553
Plaintiff:
COLBURN CLIFTON GOODEN KELLY
Defendant:
CODY JETT and JONATHAN SMITH
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00732
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
