Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Ibrahim v. Murfreesboro Medical Clinic, P.A. et al
as 3:2012cv01019
Plaintiff:
Shemeka Ibrahim
Defendant:
Murfreesboro Medical Clinic, P.A., Andrew H. Ford, Sleep Medicine of Middle Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Ford v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2012cv02889
Plaintiff:
Martha H. Ford
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tisdale v. Gravitt et al
as 2:2012cv00145
Plaintiff:
Nydia Tisdale
Defendant:
H. Ford Gravitt, City of Cumming, Georgia, Casey Tatum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wayne Ford v. Eric Shinseki
as 12-16359
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WAYNE H. FORD
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Gregory Montel Bradford v. Michael P. Noyes et al
as 2:2012cv01298
Defendant:
Michael Anotovich, Marty Azoulay, Christopher L. Burden and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Montel Bradford
FORD v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv43617
Plaintiff:
DALLAS H FORD
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
In re: Nhiem Nguyen
as 11-60045
Debtor:
In re: NHIEM TIN NGUYEN
Appellant:
NHIEM TIN NGUYEN
Appellee:
JILL H. FORD, Chapter 7 Trustee
Party Time Costume Factory Ltd v. Fantasy Lingerie et al
as 2:2011cv04956
Plaintiff:
Party Time Costume Factory Ltd
Defendant:
Fantasy Lingerie, Mike Savage, Pacoima Clothing LLC and others
Cross Defendant:
Ben Bishop, Dan Bishop, Roes 3 to 10 and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
William H Ford, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Wayne Ford v. Eric Shinseki
as 10-17827
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WAYNE H. FORD
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
FORD et al v. ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv79128
Plaintiff:
CHARLES H. FORD and VERA FORD
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY, COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC., EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
