Cases 31 - 40 of 46
KYLE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2008cv01071
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK DOUGLAS KYLE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS, CASTALINE and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Felix Ibarra-Villalva, Jr. v. A. Rios, Jr., et al
as 08-5757
Petitioner - Appellant:
FELIX IBARRA-VILLALVA, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
A. RIOS, JR., Warden and H. LAPPIN, B.O.P. Director
Ibarra-Villalva v. Rios et al
as 7:2008cv00103
Plaintiff:
Felix Ibarra-Villalva
Defendant:
A. Rios, Jr. and H. Lappin
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Ibarra-Villalva v. Lappin et al
as 7:2008cv00099
Petitioner:
Felix Ibarra-Villalva
Respondent:
H. Lappin and Mr. Rios
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Daley v. USA et al
as 4:2008cv00261
Petitioner:
Dameon Daley
Respondent:
USA, Bureau of Prisons, H Lappin and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Smith v. United States, et al
as 08-3109
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BYRON SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and others
Garcia v. Garcia et al
as 3:2008cv00024
Petitioner:
Andres Garcia
Respondent:
Walt Wells, H. Lappin and Mukasey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Moorer v. U S Penitentiary Pollock et al
as 1:2008cv00365
Plaintiff:
Stephan Moorer
Defendant:
U S Penitentiary Pollock, Federal Correctional Institution Oakdale, S Hartline and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Cole v. Pugh, et al
as 08-1053
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY ANTHONY COLE
Defendant - Appellee:
M. PUGH, Warden, C.E.O., R. HOOD, Warden, C.E.O., R. WILEY, Warden, C.E.O. and others
Bustos v. Lappin et al
as 1:2008cv00153
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lee Bustos
Defendant:
H. Lappin, Bureau of Prisons U.S.P.A.D.X. Max, Robert Wiley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
