Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Clark v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2016cv00821
Plaintiff:
Howard Clark
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Perkins et al v. Progressive Gulf Insurance Company et al
as 3:2016cv00136
Plaintiff:
Oscar Perkins , Howard Clark and Jacob Stewart
Defendant:
Progressive Gulf Insurance Company and John Does 1-10
Counter_claimant:
Progressive Gulf Insurance Company
Counter_defendant:
Howard Clark , Oscar Perkins and Jacob Stewart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Beers v. Hopkins, et al
as 8:1998cv00470
Plaintiff:
Chad Allen Beers
Defendant:
John Cherry, Howard Clark, Unknown Dunlap and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Progressive Gulf Insurance Company et al v. Perkins et al
as 3:2014cv00690
Plaintiff:
Progressive Gulf Insurance Company and Mountain Laurel Assurance Company
Defendant:
Oscar Perkins, Howard Clark, Jacob Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Clark v. Rios
as 1:2013cv01372
Petitioner:
Bert Howard Clark
Respondent:
. Rios
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jarrett v. Clarke
as 1:2013cv00542
Petitioner:
Cecil Jarrett
Respondent:
Howard Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barrett v. Pilkenton et al
as 7:2013cv00021
Plaintiff:
Christopher Adam Barrett
Defendant:
Howard Clark, Major Pickins, SWVRJ-Abingdon Medical Dept. Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Clayton Atkinson
as 12-4217
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CLAYTON ATKINSON, a/k/a Howard Clark
Ferebee v. Clarke
as 1:2012cv00283
Petitioner:
Lorenzo Gerald Ferebee
Respondent:
Howard Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ferebee v. Clarke
as 7:2012cv00120
Respondent:
Howard Clarke
Petitioner:
Lorenza Gerald Ferebee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
