Cases 31 - 40 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02554
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Bowen v. Wamp
as 1:2026cv00113
Plaintiff:
Robert Drayton Bowen
Defendant:
Weston Wamp, Ken Smith, Lee Helton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adame et al v. City of Santa Clara
as 5:2026cv03740
Plaintiff:
Philip Adame, Jameson Amato, James Arnaudo and others
Defendant:
City of Santa Clara
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
(PS) Ingram v. Health Net Community Solutions, Inc. et al
as 2:2026at00700
Plaintiff:
Chaderick A. Ingram
Defendant:
Health Net Community Solutions, Inc. and Prime Dental Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
(PS) Ingram v. Health Net Community Solutions, Inc. et al
as 2:2026cv01645
Plaintiff:
Chaderick A. Ingram
Defendant:
Health Net Community Solutions, Inc. and Prime Dental Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Dobyne et al v. GOOGLE LLC
as 4:2026cv03562
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dobyne, Alexisis Edgerton, Allen Levy and others
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lee et al v. Uihlein et al
as 1:2026cv02242
Plaintiff:
Frederick Donnell Lee
Defendant:
Richard Uihlein, Brian Uihlein, Liz Uihlein and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-998
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ingram v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2026hc02071
Petitioner:
Thomas Davis Ingram, Jr.
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
