Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 93
Domini v. Dalton et al
as 1:2011cv02907
Defendant: Commissioner Salvatore J. Cassano, Battalion Chief James Dalton, William Seeling and others
Plaintiff: Frederick Domini
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vision Bank v. 145 LLC et al
as 2:2011cv00912
Defendant: 145 LLC and James Dalton
Third_party_plaintiff: 145 LLC and James Dalton
Third_party_defendant: BP p.l.c., BP America, Inc., BP Products North America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bell v. Thomas
as 1:2011cv00243
Petitioner: James Dalton Bell
Respondent: Warden Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
United States of America v. Bell et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010mc05031
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: James Dalton Bell
Garnishee: Templeton Emerging Market Funds
Vision Bank v. 145, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00521
Plaintiff: Vision Bank
Defendant: 145, LLC, Scott D. Deichmann, Anthony J. Bordlee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. James Bell
as 10-30216
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: JAMES DALTON BELL
DALTON v. CAREY CANADA INC et al
as 2:2010cv68418
Plaintiff: JAMES DALTON
Defendant: CAREY CANADA INC , CELOTEX CORPORATION , DURODYNE EAST CORP and others
Intervenor: VENTFABRICS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James Bell v. USA
as 10-71593
Petitioner: JAMES DALTON BELL
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Bell v. US Courts et al
as 2:2010cv00604
Petitioner: James Dalton Bell
Respondent: US Courts, Federal Bureau of Prisons and All Agents of US Courts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
James Bell v. USDCTAC
as 10-70876
: In re: JAMES DALTON BELL
Petitioner: JAMES DALTON BELL
Respondent: USDC, TACOMA
Real Party In Interest: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?