Cases 31 - 40 of 62
Temujin Kensu v. Joshua Buskirk, et al
as 16-1536
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TEMUJIN KENSU
Defendant:
JOSHUA A. BUSKIRK, PANJAK MALIK, HOWARD V. TYREE and others
Defendant - Appellant:
JEFFREY STIEVE, SUSAN MCCAULEY, MARY ZAMORA and others
Cassell v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 5:2016cv00122
Plaintiff:
Harold Davey Cassell
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, Asa Hutchinson, Arkansas Board of Correction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook/Solo v. Stieve et al
as 5:2015cv00366
Plaintiff:
Don/McC Cook/Solo
Defendant:
Jeffrey Stieve
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth Johnson v. Keith Papendick, et al
as 15-2056
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
KEITH PAPENDICK, MD, (RMO), TERENCE WHITEMAN, Sup. Physician, LYNN LARSON and others
Jami Naturalite v. Gregory Forner, et al
as 15-1502
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMI NATURALITE
Defendant - Appellee:
GREGORY FORNER, Corrections Officer, ROBIN GILBERT, Arus/Spec.Trans Coord., LARRY FORD, Asst. Deputy Warden and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00359
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12133
Simpson #183627 v. Corizon Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00357
Plaintiff:
Jimmie L. Simpson #183627
Defendant:
Corizon Health, Inc., Aetna Life Insurance Company, Rebecca Nevai and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Papendick et al
as 2:2014cv14630
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Johnson
Defendant:
Keith Papendick , Jeffrey Stieve, Kevin M. Chan and others
Yeadon #896406 v. Wijayagunaratne et al
as 2:2014cv00178
Plaintiff:
Roger Yeadon #896406
Defendant:
Priyaniha Wijayagunaratne, Jeffrey Stieve, A. Robare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crowell #144211 v. Groth et al
as 2:2014cv00151
Plaintiff:
Richard Crowell #144211
Defendant:
Darek Falk and Jeffrey Stieve
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
