Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 257
Ku v. NeoPhotonics Corporation et al
as 5:2021cv09479
Plaintiff: Mengsheng Ku
Defendant: NeoPhotonics Corporation, Timothy S. Jenks, Charles J. Abbe and others
CICCOTELLI v. NEOPHOTONICS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv05611
Plaintiff: ALEX CICCOTELLI
Defendant: NEOPHOTONICS CORPORATION, TIMOTHY S JENKS, CHARLES J. ABBE and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Smith v. NeoPhotonics Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv10698
Plaintiff: Heather Smith
Defendant: NeoPhotonics Corporation, Timothy S. Jenks, Charles J. Abbe and others
Hopkins v. NeoPhotonics Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv10725
Plaintiff: Matthew Hopkins
Defendant: NeoPhotonics Corporation, Timothy S. Jenks, Charles J. Abbe and others
Ryan v. NeoPhotonics Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv00046
Plaintiff: John Ryan
Defendant: NeoPhotonics Corporation, Timothy S. Jenks, Charles J. Abbe and others
Wang v. NeoPhotonics Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv10338
Plaintiff: Elaine Wang
Defendant: NeoPhotonics Corporation, Timothy S. Jenks, Charles J. Abbe and others
Robinson, et al v. Eastman Kodak
as 6:2002cv06204
Plaintiff: Lawrence T Heinsler, Stephen M. Ellis, Thomas L. Braden and others
Special Master: Esq. Steven V Modica
Defendant: Eastman Kodak Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Jenks v. Investigator Rutledge et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2021cv05192
Plaintiff: Timmothy Lee Jenks
Defendant: Investigator Rutledge, B and L Towing and Recovery, Casey Jenks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rafael Salgado v. City of Hawthorne et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv06701
Plaintiff: Rafael Salgado
Defendant: City of Hawthorne, Jeffrey Tysl, George Bukhin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv06294
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?