Cases 31 - 40 of 52
In Re Invacare Derivative Litigation
as 1:2012cv00259
Defendant:
Dan T. Moore, III, C. Martin Harris, Dale C. LaPorte and others
Plaintiff:
Colleen Witmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv51845
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. JONES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
City of Lansing Police and Fire Retirement System v. Blouch et al
as 1:2011cv01893
Defendant:
Gerald B. Blouch , Aaron Malachi Mixon, III , Joseph B. Richey, II and others
Plaintiff:
City of Lansing Police and Fire Retirement System
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 301
JONES v. 3M et al
as 2:2011cv66512
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. JONES
Defendant:
3M, ALLIS CHALMERS CORPORATION PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones et al v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2011cv00611
Plaintiff:
James L. Jones
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Gibbs v. McKeon et al
as 3:2010cv01208
Defendant:
Dionel M. Aviles, James T. Conway, John H. Dalton and others
Amicu:
Jane Does 1-50
Plaintiff:
Curtis A. Gibbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Jones et al
as 3:2010cv00321
Petitioner:
Dannie Ray Davis
Respondent:
James L. Jones, Joe E. Moya, Stephen P. Henson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burns et al v. Thaler et al
as 4:2010cv02900
Plaintiff:
James Paul Burns and Damon R Capps
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, James L Jones, Corey G Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice et al
as 3:2010cv00195
Plaintiff:
Dannie Ray Davis
Defendant:
Texas Department Of Criminal Justice, James L Jones and J P Guyton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Anderson v. Joe Butler, et al
as 09-41152
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT W. ANDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JOE BUTLER, JOHNNY ABRAHAM, PAUL JUNG and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
