Cases 31 - 40 of 101
Davis v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv07372
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey P. Davis
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Petland, Inc. v. Grove City Ohio et al
as 2:2016cv00345
Plaintiff:
Petland, Inc.
Defendant:
City of Grove City , Jeffrey M Davis , Ted A Berry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. United States of America
as 5:2016cv00067
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Paul Davis
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Davis v. Shade et al
as 1:2016cv00689
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey M. Davis
Defendant:
Jacob C. Shade, Creade V. Brodie, Jr. and William R. Valentine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv04879
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rosenberg v. Lincoln Life Annuity Company of New York et al
as 1:2015cv05063
Defendant:
Esq. Jeffrey M Davis and Lincoln Life Annuity Company of New York
Plaintiff:
Zev Rosenberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Davis et al v. Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv02602
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey G Davis and Nancy Davis
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Services Inc , Johnson & Johnson Inc and DePuy Orthopaedics Inc
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis et al v. Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. et al
as MD/8:15-cv-01962
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey G. Davis and Nancy Davis
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson, Inc. and DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
Davis v. Gardonez et al
as 1:2015cv06156
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey T. Davis
Defendant:
Gardonez, Gladys C. Taylor, Nickelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis et al v. Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. et al
as 8:2015cv01962
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey G. Davis and Nancy Davis
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Inc. and DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
