Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Johnson v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
as 2:2012cv01712
Plaintiff:
Joel Johnson
Defendant:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Johnson v. City of New York
as 11-3844
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Joel Johnson
Defendant - Appellee:
City of New York, Corporation Counsel, Dora Schriro, City Commissioner, Jane Doe, Captain Evan and others
Johnson v. New York City et al
as 1:2010cv08927
Plaintiff:
Joel Johnson
Defendant:
New York City, Dora B. Schriro, Jane Doe-Dep. Barette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Jane Doe et al
as 1:2010cv07272
Plaintiff:
Joel Johnson
Defendant:
Jane Doe, New York City and Dora B. Schriro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. New York City (Corporate Counsel) et al
as 1:2010cv07268
Plaintiff:
Joel Johnson
Defendant:
New York City (Corporate Counsel), Dora B. Schriro, Jane Doe and others
Consolidated_defendant:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Schriro et al
as 1:2010cv06193
Plaintiff:
Joel Johnson
Defendant:
Dora Schriro, Jane Doe-Dep Barrette, Jane Doe -Dep. Canty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. New York City et al
as 1:2010cv05359
Plaintiff:
Joel Johnson
Defendant:
New York City, Dora B. Schriro, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2010cv02873
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY JOHNSON
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, FRAZIER LYDE, PECHKURO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2010cv02800
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY JOHNSON
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, FRAZIER J. LYDE, PECHKURO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Olympus NDT, Inc. v. Johnson
as 1:2009cv11344
Plaintiff:
Olympus NDT, Inc.
Defendant:
Joel Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
