Cases 31 - 40 of 42
John Quintanilla, Jr. v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 11-70002
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN MANUEL QUINTANILLA, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
John Calderon v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 11-10129
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN MANUEL CALDERON
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Caldron v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2010cv00210
Petitioner:
John Manuel Caldron
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gamez Jr v. IndyMac Bank et al
as 2:2009cv01628
Plaintiff:
Antonio M. Gamez, Jr.
Defendant:
IndyMac Bank, Indymac Bank, F.S.B., Regional Trustee Service Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Gamez Jr v. IndyMac Bank et al
as 2:2009at00929
Plaintiff:
Antonio M Gamez Jr
Defendant:
IndyMac Bank, Indymac Bank, F.S.B., Regional Trustee Service Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
v. Quintanilla
as 6:2009cv00039
Defendant:
John Manuel Quintanilla, Jr. and Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus(Death Penalty)
USA v. Hernandez
as 08-10998
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN MANUEL HERNANDEZ
Jonathan Riches v. John Melendrez
as 08-7802
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN MANUEL MELENDREZ, CHRISTOPHER ERIC MCNEIL, STEPHEN JAMES STAPLETON and others
Jonathan Riches v. John Melendrez
as 08-7381
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN MANUEL MELENDREZ and KENT AOKI
Quintanilla -v- Quarterman
as 6:2008mc00005
Petitioner:
John Manuel Quintanilla, Jr.
Defendant:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
