Cases 31 - 40 of 89
DEJESUS v. VERINT SYSTEMS, INC.
as 1:2017cv13102
Plaintiff:
JOSE DEJESUS
Defendant:
VERINT SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sandoval v. Vasquez et al
as 1:2017cv08349
Defendant:
Det Torres, Sgt Vasquez, Service List and others
Plaintiff:
Jose DeJesus Sandoval
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ocegueda v. Ironwood State Prison
as 4:2017cv06615
Petitioner:
Jose DeJesus Ocegueda
Respondent:
Warden Ironwood State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
USA v. Jose Antonio Ferretiz
as 17-11012
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE DEJESUS ANTONIO FERRETIZ
Jose DeJesus Santana Aguilar v. Raymond Madden
as 2:2017cv06414
Respondent:
Warden Raymond Madden
Petitioner:
Jose DeJesus Santana Aguilar
Rodriguez v. Sampson
as 2:2017cv01479
Plaintiff:
Jose DeJesus Rodriguez
Defendant:
Joyce Sampson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Carbajal et al v. Central Fumigation Department, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv22596
Plaintiff:
Ivan Carbajal , Jose DeJesus , Lisandro Garzon and others
Defendant:
Central Fumigation Department, Inc. , Roberto Rivera and Jose Rivera-Lugo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
USA v. Jose Martinez-Soto
as 17-20383
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE MARTINEZ-SOTO, also known as Jose Dejesus Martinez, also known as Jesus Sanchez-Ramirez, also known as Jose De Jesus Martinez-Soto, also known as Jose De Jesus Martinez Soto, also known as Jose Dejesus Martinez Soto, also known as Jose De Martinez So
DeJesus v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2017cv04527
Plaintiff:
Jose DeJesus
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jose Dejesus Alonso v. USA
as 4:2016cv00504
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jose DeJesus Alonso
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
