Cases 31 - 40 of 503
Loredo Rangel v. Garland
as 23-60089
Petitioner:
Sonia Guadalupe Loredo Rangel, Luisa Fernanda Lopez Loredo and Mary Jose Lopez Loredo
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Keith Stansell, et al v. Samark Bello, et al
as 22-13454
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KEITH STANSELL, MARC GONSALVES, THOMAS HOWES and others
Defendant / Appellant:
SAMARK JOSE LOPEZ BELLO and YAKIMA TRADING CORPORATION
Interested Party:
PROFIT CORP. CA, SMT TECHNOLOGIA CA and PYP INTERNATIONAL, LLC
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv02404
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
United States v. Jovel
as 22-4089
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE LOPEZ JOVEL
US Bank National Association v. Jose Lopez
as 22-12705
Plaintiff / Appellee:
US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE LOPEZ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01640
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hernandez et al v. Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit District (SMART)
as 4:2021cv01782
Plaintiff:
Michael Caldwell, Phyllis Accornero, Paul Naepflin and others
Defendant:
Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit District (SMART)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States v. Jose Lopez-Raya
as 22-2842
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jose Lopez-Raya
LOPEZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv17102
Plaintiff:
JOSE RAUL LOPEZ and JOSE LOPEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
LOPEZ v. EDWARDS et al
as 2:2022cv04821
Plaintiff:
MR. CARLOS JOSE LOPEZ
Defendant:
RONALD P EDWARDS, MICHAEL CONRAD, WELLPATH MEDICAL DEPT. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
