Cases 31 - 40 of 1,048
Peinado v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv00063
Plaintiff:
Jose Manuel Peinado
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Vargas v. United States Border Patrol-Customs and Border Protection et al
as 3:2023cv00410
Plaintiff:
Jose Manuel Vargas
Defendant:
United States Border Patrol-Customs and Border Protection, United States Border Patrol Supervisor and United States Border Patrol
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00543
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv15001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
In re: Henry Zelaya
as 23-267
Petitioner:
In re: HENRY ZELAYA, a/k/a Homeboy, a/k/a Jose Manuel Alvarado
Diaz v. Harpe
as 23-5105
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSE MANUEL DIAZ
Respondent / Appellee:
STEVEN HARPE
ALVAREZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv12269
Plaintiff:
JOSE MANUEL ALVAREZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ballard v. Newmont Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv01033
Plaintiff:
William Ballard
Defendant:
Newmont Corporation, Patrick G. Awuah, Jr., Gregory H. Boyce and others
CHAVEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv03895
Plaintiff:
JOSE MANUEL CHAVEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $299,745.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
as 1:2023cv01584
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
$299,745.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
Claimant:
JOSE MANUEL GARCIA, JR.
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
