Cases 31 - 40 of 75
Harris v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv01056
Plaintiff:
Kennedy Lee Harris
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, John Crow, Joseph Headley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armendariz v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv01046
Plaintiff:
Daniel Armendariz
Defendant:
Joseph Headley, K. Davis, Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jaeger v. Graddick et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2019cv01035
Defendant:
Joseph Headley, Charles Graddick and Steven T. Marshall
Plaintiff:
William Dale Jeager and William Dale Jaeger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Parish v. Dunn et al
as 2:2019cv00878
Defendant:
Joseph Headley, Jefferson Dunn, Jeremy A. Singleton and others
Plaintiff:
Ed Parish, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richards v. Headley
as 2:2019cv00845
Plaintiff:
Eddie Richards
Defendant:
Joseph Headley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richards v. Headley (CONSENT)
as 1:2019cv00845
Plaintiff:
Eddie Richards
Defendant:
Joseph Headley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oryang v. Mitchum et al
as 2:2019cv01615
Defendant:
Alabama Dept of Corrections, Joseph Headley, Jefferson Dunn and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Bedogwar Oryang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2019cv00700
Defendant:
Joseph Headley, Mrs. Thomas, Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Taylor, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dowell v. Headley et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00257
Plaintiff:
Jacob Ward Jefferson Dowell
Defendant:
Alfonzo Woodson, Joseph Headley and Jefferson S. Dunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moody v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00043
Defendant:
Joseph Headley, Alabama Department of Corrections and Elmore Correctional Facility
Plaintiff:
Thomas F. Moody
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
