Cases 31 - 40 of 383
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00614
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Canterbury v. King
as 2:2019cv00586
Defendant:
Timothy King
Plaintiff:
Danny L. Canterbury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nichols v. King
as 2:2019cv00563
Plaintiff:
Keith Nichols
Defendant:
Timothy King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reg Transport Services, L.L.C. v. Dutch Miller Chrysler/Jeep/Ram et al
as 2:2019cv00556
Plaintiff:
Reg Transport Services, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Dutch Miller Chrysler/Jeep/Ram
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Dutch Miller of Charleston
3Rd Party Defendant:
Thermo King of Central Carolinas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Bennett v. King et al
as 2:2019cv00541
Defendant:
Timothy King and Erica Adkins
Plaintiff:
Bobby M. Bennett, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bygum et al v. The City of Montgomery et al
as 2:2019cv00456
Plaintiff:
Deborah Bygum and Eric Michell Young
Defendant:
The City of Montgomery, Roger L. King and The Montgomery Policy Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Proctor v. Roane County Commission et al
as 2:2019cv00432
Defendant:
Z. W. Hartley, S. A. McDonald, M. P. King and others
Plaintiff:
Brad E. Proctor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ziegler v. Clay County Sheriff et al
as 2:2019cv00410
Defendant:
Fran King, M. P. Morris, Clay County Sheriff and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ziegler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Acosta et al v. Rock N Roll Coal Co. Inc.
as 1:2019cv00242
Plaintiff:
Carolyn King and R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Rock N Roll Coal Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Idleman v. King, et al
as 2:2019cv00069
Plaintiff:
David Idleman
Defendant:
Deputy Mike King, Officer John Doe and Trooper Seth McDonald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
